With the first of two Vioxx trials to start on June 21, 2006, Merck & Co. has filed a motion for summary judgment on the case of a 73 year-old man who had a heart attack after taking Vioxx. The basis of the motion is that the lawsuit was filed after the statute of limitations had ran in California. A hearing on that motion is set for June 15, 2006. Although the motion is most likely to be denied, a grant of summary judgment could end the case before it even really begins for the former Vioxx user. Los Angeles State Court Judge Victoria Chaney is presiding over the matter along with another case involving a 66 year-old man named Stewart Grossberg, who also suffered a heart attack after taking Vioxx. Merck's summary judgment motion was filed soon after the mega drug manufacture was hit with a $32 million verdict in Texas where a 71 year-old man died from a heart attack after taking Vioxx.
According to Law.Com
"In light of the recent verdicts, and that recent study, it wouldn't be surprising if they were re-evaluating their approach to individual cases," said Thomas Dewey, a partner at New York-based Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky who specializes in complex civil litigation but is not involved in the Vioxx cases. Calls to Merck were referred to the company's Los Angeles lawyer, Ralph Campillo, a partner at San Francisco-based Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold. Campillo said that the recent survey and jury verdict have nothing to do with the summary judgment motion, which argues that the case should be thrown out because it was filed after the statute of limitations ran.
Calls to Merck were referred to the company's Los Angeles lawyer, Ralph Campillo, a partner at San Francisco-based Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold. Campillo said that the recent survey and jury verdict have nothing to do with the summary judgment motion, which argues that the case should be thrown out because it was filed after the statute of limitations ran.
The next month could to an interesting one for the State of California and those who suffered from the effects of Vioxx there. Should the summary judgment motions be denied and these victims of Vioxx be allowed their day in court, Merck & Co. could be in serious trouble for some of its acts and omissions concerning the multi-billion drug Vioxx.
For more info the California Vioxx Trials click here...
Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader
Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.
Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.
Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.
Find an InjuryBoard Blog in your area:
Alabama
Birmingham
Gadsden
Huntsville
Mobile
Montgomery
Alaska
Anchorage
Fairbanks
Arizona
Chandler
Phoenix
Scottsdale
Tucson
Arkansas
Bentonville
El Dorado
Jonesboro
Little Rock
Mountain Home
California
Bakersfield
Chico
Fresno
Glendale
Huntington Beach
Lancaster
Long Beach
Los Angeles
Modesto
Novato
Oakland
Orange County
Redding
Sacramento
San Diego
San Diego County
San Francisco
San Jose
San Luis Obispo
Santa Clarita
Stockton
Ventura
Colorado
Colorado Springs
Denver
Fort Collins
Grand Junction
Connecticut
Hartford
New Haven
Waterbury
District of Columbia
Metro D.C.
Washington
Florida
Central Florida
Fort Lauderdale
Ft. Myers
Gainesville, Ocala & Daytona Beach
Jacksonville
Melbourne
Miami
Orlando
Pensacola
Sarasota
Tallahassee
Tampa Bay
West Palm Beach
Georgia
Atlanta
Hawaii
Honolulu
Idaho
Boise
Illinois
Chicago
Chicago-Land
Cook County
Rockford & Moline
Springfield
Indiana
Bloomington
Indianapolis
Iowa
Council Bluffs
Davenport
Des Moines
Fort Dodge
Waterloo
Kansas
Topeka
Wichita
Kentucky
Bowling Green
Louisville
Paducah
Louisiana
Baton Rouge
Lafayette
New Orleans
Maine
Bangor & Augusta
Maryland
Baltimore
Massachusetts
Boston
Cape Cod
Stoughton / Canton
Michigan
Detroit
Grand Rapids
Lansing
Traverse City
Minnesota
Minneapolis
St. Cloud
Mississippi
Biloxi & Gulfport
Tupelo
Missouri
Jefferson City
Kansas City
St. Louis
Montana
Missoula
Nebraska
Lincoln
Omaha
Nevada
Las Vegas
Reno
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Bergen County
Cherry Hill
Jersey City
Newark
Trenton
New York
Buffalo
Long Island
New York City
Northern New York
Syracuse
North Carolina
Charlotte
Fayetteville
Greensboro
Greenville, OBX & Rocky Mount
Raleigh
Wilmington
Ohio
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Dayton
Findlay
Sandusky
Toledo
Oklahoma
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
Oregon
Portland
Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
Rhode Island
Providence
South Carolina
Charleston
Columbia
Florence / Myrtle Beach
Greenville
Spartanburg
Tennessee
Chattanooga
Nashville
Texas
Austin
Beaumont
Brownsville
Corpus Christi
Dallas
Galveston Bay
Houston
Laredo
McAllen
North Dallas
San Antonio
Tyler
Victoria
Waco
Utah
Salt Lake City
Vermont
Virginia
Charlottesville
Fairfax, Leesburg & Loudoun
Norfolk, Portsmouth & Hampton
Northern Virginia
Richmond
Roanoke
Virginia Beach, Chesapeake & Suffolk
Everett
King County
Olympia
Seattle
Tacoma
Vancouver
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Milwaukee
Wyoming
Cheyenne
Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer
Tampa Lawyer